University of Iowa, May 10-11, 2014

Proposal Submission Deadline: January 15, 2014

This workshop conference, which will result in an edited volume, will examine key instances in modern Japanese literary history (nineteenth through twenty-first centuries) in which personal arguments changed the face of the literary establishment (bundan) by pushing one author or faction to the periphery in favor of another. Among other questions, we will explore how elegant, scathing authorial attacks, often published in magazines or otherwise aired in public–what we are calling “snark”–affect literary genres and rhetoric. We argue that fights have had as much, if not more, influence in defining Japanese literature as alliances.

Although the term “bundan” is often taken to have a specific definition, to indicate the control of Japanese letters by various coteries and factions in the prewar period, the word has always been amorphous and continues to be used in a looser sense to indicate the Japanese literary establishment in general. For good reason, we argue: although the Japanese publishing industry is one of the largest in the world, the terms under which one achieves literary recognition—through prizes, book contracts, and other forms–continue to be surprisingly personal. Writers today continue to gain access to publication through contacts with literary circles and the good offices of literary mentors.

Traditional histories of modern Japanese literature have emphasized the groups that have held sway in turn: the aesthetes of the Shirakaba School, the politically engaged rabble-rousers of the proletariat movement, the autobiographical writers of the Third Generation of Postwar Writers, and so on. We seek to restore an understanding of the maelstrom of literary-history-as-it-was-lived by approaching the faults that conventional narrative elides: the moments at which coteries were formed or fell to pieces, literary movements were yet inchoate or recently fallen by the wayside, and individual ambitions collided, sending those involved in separate directions. Time and again, we find, decisions that have serious consequences for the trajectory of culture are based in seemingly petty spats and shallow disagreements between individuals. Some literary fights may be genuinely petty, but our project focuses on disagreements with deeper subtexts, in which political and aesthetic schisms that cannot be voiced openly are papered over with the personal. Snark is a way of approaching individual opinions and voices that are taken for granted or dismissed by standard accounts of larger cultural shifts.

We invite proposals on a range of fights between authors, factions, editors, publishers, and prize committees that accentuate the personal inherent within wider literary politics. Participants will make 30-minute presentations in a forum open to the public and must commit to submitting expanded written versions (6,000-8,000 words) within 6 months for an edited volume. Thanks to the generosity of the Center for Asian and Pacific Studies at the University of Iowa, some funding will be available to subsidize travel costs.

Please email a 250-word abstract and current C.V. to Kendall Heitzman (kendall-heitzman@uiowa.edu) and Alisa Freedman (alisaf@uoregon.edu) by January 15, 2014.